>>92218
Here are the cover and first 3 pages of Issue 2 (looks like page 3 wasn't even there yet in the throwback pic), as well as and the cover art for Issue 4.
Can't find Issue 3 Cover in my stash but I do remember exactly what it looks like. Full disclosure, IDK if you've seen it before, but at least on my end, I'd probably call it my single least favorite page of *any* of his art.
The cover says something like "In This Issue: Other Forms of Expansion!" and it has two girls in a very industrial-looking (as opposed to candy-filled) factory. One girl's floating, upside down in mid-air, and her buttcheeks are each inflated to the size of overfilled exercise balls with helium.
She's barely still in reach, but is holding hands with another girl who's visibly pinned to the floor by her own very heavily expanded boobs, each of which is about a foot less in diameter than she stands tall.
IMHO at least, their proportions weren't very ... well ... well-proportioned??? Lol
The giant tits and ass they have are not particularly "attractive" and kinda just seem frumpy and *"off"*-looking. Now that I'm thinking back on it, the girls also - for some reason beyond my comprehension - magically have on bland clothes that grew to contain the unreasonable size their sexual features were in the process of swelling to.
It feels almost like a bootleg "JohnnySwell at home" your Mom makes you settle for.
Something the first issue did an amazing job of subverting for the "genre" was the whole damn trope of clothes that conveniently ensure the inflation victim they contain isn't further humiliated by the loss of her modesty. The cover of Issue 1 even included the detail of showing a seam between her boobs that suggests her shirt was sewn together from two separate shirts.