I don't think there is a thing we can do about it. I am hoping that everything here is anonymous and that the identity of the idiot remains unknown. And while very annoying for most of us, posting a link that makes it easy to access - and discover - the content is not and should not be a punishable offense. I hate it and am angry with what some total idiots do on here, but idiocy remains a permissible action here and ought not to be punished other than by incurring the opprobrium of the community.

>>82950 The DMCA people are pros, they know their shit. Most search engines can decode B64 now or at least tell you that it is B64. Your partial and double decoded link lastet 4 hours. Someone needs to persuade our dear leader to allow other hoster. I know at least 3 that last longer, some even work with JD, but they are not allowed.

>>82954 I do hope it was the "dirty hacker" she already mentioned .. prob from America, who knows!

>>82954 *encoded link

>>82954 Just to make this clear, i did not repost your link, i'm just another Kraut. I could reup some of your stuff to mab if that's ok.

Re-upload the content. Open a text file and paste the link there. Create a zip file with the link. Upload this file with the link, not the pink file directly to the content. This way the content will not be deleted.

>>82954 This un-encoded fast-file link: >>>/ssbbw/180917 (does cross-linking work like this?) lasted for four days and would likely have lasted indefinitely, but when some fellow Germanbro posted it in the Boberry thread, it was gone in hours.

>>82954 ...and the partial and *triple-decoded link lasted until some idiot re-posted it in plain writing. After that it was gone in less than 10 minutes. The incident has been purged since.

>>82959 Of course you can. I won't be reuploading for a while. It always takes hours (you know our Neuland situation), and if some idiot reveals it, all the effort is frustrated in minutes.

>>82964 Ok i'll ul the newer vids soon, but not all your stuff. It was a lot ! Checked the archive: Your partial link lastet about 5 hours until the first complain without any repost. These guys are etting paid for this takedown shit.

I just want to take this time to say that all of you bros providing download links just by the grace of your hearts are gods gift to us coomers. Shine on my niggers, thank you for the hard work.

>>82965 You're right, I confused it with another link that was taken down after being reposted.

>>82966 You are very welcome, Tommy.

It's ridiculously easy to break b64 because it's an encoding used not to generate data security, but to normalize strings for use in http/s URLs. I propose a solution, which will be much more complicated, but which might make the links stay online longer: using AES encryption with a 256-bit symmetric key, a symmetric key generated through something unique that all topics possess. The output could be a b64 string, but it would only be correctly decoded with the symmetric key. Of course, there would be initial confusion, common to all experiences of adopting a new standard, but it would be very interesting when fully implemented by the community. Well, this is just a suggestion; more different ideas, or even improvements to this model, would be interesting.