>>83677 Generaly speaking on the low end BBW starts at 250lbs/113kg and SSBBW at 300lbs/160kg or by some standards at 400lbs/180kg. Others argue that it's also dependent on height so they go for a BMI limit.

>>83677 According to BBW Wiki: a BBW is someone from 200lbs/90kg to 350lbs/159kg, SSBBW 350lbs/159kg to 600lbs/272kg, and USSBBW is 600lbs/272kg+. The terms can be subjective and don't have any strict definitions. So I might consider someone 80kg to be a BBW whereas someone else might consider them chubby. As for you, being 100kg would put you put you in the BBW category as long as you're extra weight comes from mostly fat and not muscle. >>83678 Not sure where you're getting BBW at 250lbs/113kg and SSBBW at 300lbs/160kg from

>>83677 Oh, it is a very subjected topic. While some folks make it a weight statement it's more about sheer fatness of a girl. If a girl is 148 cm tall she will be nicely fluffy and soft even at 110 kg. If she's 170cm 110 kg is basically slightly chubby and is very far from bbw status. My rule of thumb is this - once she is considerably fat, or fat enough that she gets body features only fat people have (belly hang, hanging fat on upper arms, actual ass, etc) she is a BBW. Once her body shape is significantly altered by fatness (as for example distinctive and large belly, side rolls and back rolls that change body shape, own shape of limbs, no neck, no knee bones or other individual unique features resulting from obesity) then she is a SSBBW. If she doesn't resemble humans up close and is fat enough to look like an evolution into a better species and is gigantic, albeit not very agile/mobile blob of a princess - then its an USSBBW. P.S. If you are okay with strangers ogling your body you might try posting a pic of yours (faceless and fully dressed will suffice) and have folks here argue about your definition.

>>83677 Pure weight doesn't give a metric, neither does BMI, a person could a weigh a lot and have a high BMI due to being muscular. In reality just your body fat percentage and general appearance should be enough. As far as I go you're still in the "chubby" range up until your belly starts overlapping your waist then you enter fat territory. >>83696 Yes visual appearances and body fat percentage are the true metrics, pure weight/BMI means nothing (albeit I doubt there's much people who are 350lbs+ and pure muscle.

>>83677 Hola, Chilena! These terms (BBW and SSBBW) were invented 30 years ago by women themselves in the early days of “fat acceptance” and “fat positivity” efforts. As such, originally they had much more to do with lifestyle impact (and decreasing levels of social privilege) than any precise number on a scale. Defined at the time as: >BBW “Big Beautiful Woman” This was first created as an positive alternative name for “fat”, and was often characterized by things like: - You don’t fit into standard sizes when shopping for clothes, and always need to find the “plus size section” or a separate plus size shop - Typical men might have a hard time dating you / shallow people don’t treat you the same because you’re “fat” - It’s clear the world isn’t really built with you in mind— some of the most flimsy furniture or tightest spaces in cities require extra care or effort to navigate >While this type of experience typically starts around 180-220lbs, it totally depends on the person >SSBBW “Supersize BBW” This was created later by women to note that above a certain weight, there is a whole additional set of challenges that you encounter. (The word “supersize” is tongue-in-cheek from the 1990s advertising craze at the time.) - Pretty much all your clothes have to be ordered online, since “plus sizes” don’t go up far enough in stores - Dating options begin to get very narrow simply because of your body size (mostly limited to certain types of FAs and the handful of guys who genuinely don’t have any physical preferences AND don’t mind the physical limitations) - Physical limitations everywhere: if there aren’t armless chairs you perhaps cannot attend, activities involving lots of walking are likely a no, and driving certain vehicles is problematic, just for example. - Social realities: You’re not the “invisible fat girl” but often the “whoa, how did that happen?” or “if we hired her, how would we even accommodate?”. You’re often not invited to things anymore just because of the extra work/awkwardness, and you often have to quietly decline invitations just because you don’t know if things like the seating will even be workable for you. >This kind of experience typically starts around 350-400 pounds, but again definitely depends on the person Even later, “Ultra-Supersize BBW” or “USSBBW” was added to denote women who experience yet further limitations (e.g., can’t really fit in cars, tailored clothing mostly, etc.), for folks beginning in the 600-700 range. Of course these acronyms found their way into how early internet models advertised themselves, and then became standard nomenclature for sexualized content as well. Hence this board.

>>83677 ¡Hola, chilena bella! Estos términos (BBW y SSBBW) los inventaron las propias mujeres hace unos 30 años, en los primeros tiempos de los movimientos de “aceptación corporal” y “positividad corporal”. En ese contexto, al principio tenían mucho más que ver con el impacto en la vida diaria (y con distintos niveles de privilegio social) que con un número exacto en la balanza. En ese momento se definían más o menos así: > BBW “Big Beautiful Woman” (Mujer grande y bonita) Se creó primero como una forma positiva de decir “gorda”, y solía implicar cosas como: * No entras en tallas estándar al comprar ropa, y siempre tienes que buscar la “sección plus size” o ir a tiendas especializadas * A los hombres “típicos” les puede costar salir contigo / la gente superficial no te trata igual por ser “gorda” * Es evidente que el mundo no está pensado para ti: muebles frágiles o espacios muy estrechos en la ciudad requieren más cuidado o esfuerzo para moverte > Este tipo de experiencia suele empezar alrededor de los ~85–100 kilos, pero depende mucho de cada persona > SSBBW “Supersize BBW” Este término lo crearon después las mismas mujeres para señalar que, sobre cierto peso, aparecen desafíos adicionales. (Lo de “supersize” es medio en broma, tomado de la publicidad noventera.) * Casi toda tu ropa hay que pedirla por internet, porque las tallas grandes en tienda no alcanzan * Las opciones de pareja se vuelven mucho más limitadas simplemente por el tamaño corporal (básicamente ciertos tipos de FAs y unos pocos hombres que de verdad no tienen preferencias físicas y no les complican las limitaciones) * Limitaciones físicas en todos lados: si no hay sillas sin brazos, quizás ni puedes asistir; actividades con mucha caminata, difícil; manejar ciertos autos también se complica, por ejemplo * Realidades sociales: ya no eres la “gorda invisible”, sino más bien la de “wow, ¿cómo llegó a eso?” o “si la contratamos, ¿cómo la acomodamos?”. Muchas veces dejan de invitarte a cosas por la incomodidad o el esfuerzo extra, y tú misma a veces tienes que rechazar invitaciones porque ni sabes si algo tan básico como los asientos te va a servir > Este tipo de experiencia suele empezar alrededor de los ~160–180 kilos, aunque también depende de la persona Más adelante todavía se sumó “Ultra-Supersize BBW” o “USSBBW”, para referirse a mujeres que enfrentan limitaciones aún mayores (por ejemplo, no caber bien en autos, necesidad de ropa a medida, etc.), generalmente desde los ~270–320 kilos en adelante. Con el tiempo, estos términos también se empezaron a usar en cómo se promocionaban modelos en los inicios de internet, y después pasaron a ser parte del vocabulario estándar en contenido más sexualizado. De ahí viene este tipo de foro.

Hola amiga!, un gusto conocerte, generalmente una bbw ya vendria siendo una guatonsita como se dice, yo aproximo unos 90kg para arriba, un saludo amiga cualquier cosa aca estamos