>>117750 Classic. Source?

>>26207 >>77271

Anyone have inflateress and chase-the-rabbit artwork?

>>26207 See >>139720 >>140013

>>142824 >Barge into thread that's been on the board since 2021 >Thread only received one post a month (if that) since August >Last post not even on topic, basically dead already >Attempting to divert with links to 2 threads created a month ago >both only partially relevant to the topic So retarded it's almost impressive

>>143168 literally was thinking the same thing lmao didn't think anyone could possibly be that retarded

>>142824 >>143168 >>143177 I've seen this guy show up once in awhile and I'm wondering what do they even accomplish from doing this

>>143191 Nearly every thread I see this shit on is either a long standing or a continuation thread they keep attempting to divert to newer, dead, or completely irrelevant ones. Is it a bit? Is it rage bait? Is it the deranged ramblings of a schizoid? Is it actual raw unfiltered mental retardation? We may never know.

>>143193 Not to mention every suggestion they make I could you not they'll make a suggestion for mergers of threads and yeah that could happen there are some that honestly could just be fused together like why do we have multiple draw threads? Why isn't there a pinned draw thread and morph general? But they'll be suggesting we fuse a floating thread with a completely irrelevant piss and fart thread? Like the hell? At this point I do take it as rage bait as you can't tell me you don't know the difference between fart inflation and floating? Or the difference between a lost media thread and a movie scenes one. Or for example you could say soda inflation and water inflation are technically liquid in general but again recommending something indifferent as a TMC thread and a scat thread get fused together is wild!

>>143450 Kamen Rider on an inflation smut site? More likely then you'd expect.

>>143444 I mean, this is obviously trolling, right? What else could it be? There's no way someone could be serious while saying and doing shit *this* stupid.

>>145172 Anon has a point we need less threads not more.

>>145221 You're right, we should totally build a fucking time machine so we can go back and prevent this thread from existing because two mildly similar threads would appear four years later.

>>143535 Could be wilder Kamen Rider inflation on a inflation site

Does anybody know who this is https://thisvid.com/videos/tied-inflation/

It’s anonymousqueen95, the linked vid is private , could you reup to go file?

>>56849 Where the image comes from

>>26207 source for 4th image?

>>149941 This is ai you retard

>>150988 Mid-tier AI, too. Looks like a mediocre model with a good LoRA, if I had to guess.

Does any one have this comic

Hope this counts? It's with a human and a fat rock monster getting stuck.

>>154253 CUTE.

>>161179 Fuck, that kind of panic is so hot. I don't know if I want to be her or watch her go up...

>>161179 Its scary how well AI can pass as a real drawing at first glance these days

>>161409 Oh, god dammit, really? Then I hope it happens to whoever posted it!

>>161409 its scary how far crazy ideologues who are clearly angry stakeholders or other kinds of obsessed loser fixated on fighting the future, will go to witchhunt and persecute anything as being Ai and therefore automatically bad. it's the same kind of delusion that anti nuclear protesters and those who didn't like factories when those came about, had. history is not on your side. I can recall a time when photoghraphers were having tantrums about photoshop, and I know when photography came about there were portraiture artists pretty mad about that as well. nothing new under the sun. more naive children whinging about nothing of real consequence in the long run.

>>161479 It's fine if YOU want to consume mindless garbage but most poeple prefer real art made by real people. I'm sure there are plenty of threads, websites, and pig troughs for you to circle jerk with other "ai artist" about your masterpieces so theres no point in being at a place that post real art. So if you truly believe that ai is the future then leave us in the past and go fuck off to the future.

>>161488 It's so funny that literally the only argument they can come up with is "Well, painters were pissed when cameras were invented!!" as if that comparison is in any way valid.

>>161479 it's unauthentic, photoshop doesn't replace photography, it just lets you tweak photos, the camera didn't replace the painter, it just made an alternate art, and something that could be used to have an objective depiction of something. What does AI create ? Endless torrent of regurgitated images that come from someone else, it doesn't do anything new, all it does is just slop and slop, and unlike anything human made, you can't outpace an AI. The end result is just that anything on the internet will just get replaced by AI slop, and soon enough you won't be able to use the internet, because there's just 99% AI slop, just look at the big social medias, it's already 99% bots, now imagine those bots, but they look and act human, horrifying no ? Imagine having an entourage of people who you believe are your closest friends, only for it to turn out that they're all coming from a data center, all pretending to be your friends in order to influence you to buy X or Y product, or imagine, a scandalous photo of you, having sex with a dead dog, "but I wouldn't do that !" yeah, you wouldn't, but the photo still exists, because an AI generated it, it looks believable, everyone will think that you're a dead dog fucker, and no matter how much you'll scream about it being fake, they won't believe you, because there's photographic evidence, even if it's doctored, we're in a world where there is no truth because any shitter with a PC and enough free time can fake anything for cheap. tl;dr : AI will replace humans on the internet and all you'll be seeing will be shit because AI are just souped up versions of Cleverbot recycling the same things in its database, and it'll spiral into an ouroboros of shit because humans will be inspired by the shitty AI content, and then the AI will be trained on the shitty human AI inspired content, and thus it will inbreed itself into a hellscape where everyone only knows shit.

>>161523 I'm not going to pretend that AI can't be used for good, for example, it's great at making code or taking care of tedious tasks, but it's clear that the only people using it are shitters and who doesn't care that it'll have massive repercussions because they're all going with a "move fast break things" approach to line their pockets.

>>161523 >photoshop doesn't replace photography Adobe didn't invent the word "photoshop", it's an existing term for a reason. Photoshopping was a whole career where people in the dark rooms would physically edit photos, usually the negatives, for whatever reason needed, like removing someone from a pic, or making the picture lighter/darker, and so on. Digital cameras becoming a thing was the first hit, but photo editing software was the knockout blow. All this ended up killing off a ton of paint/canvas supply companies and stores too. The whole time all this is going on, loads of people were happy, while loads of others were mad, it lowered the skill floor too much. Now instead of having to practice with your camera to get the lenses right and the f-stop right, or know how long the exposure should be, you can just snap an okay photo and photoshop out any issues in under an hour. >the camera didn't replace the painter 100% did. I mean sure, painting is still "a thing", but barely, compared to pre-camera. Painters were the "photos" of the day, you'd pay someone to paint you and your family just like paying to get your family's picture taken. Painters would be commissioned to go off to some scenic place to paint a landscape, or to go to a battle and paint the battle (often making one side look better, haha), or they'd paint some exotic animal from another country (hopefully not off the memory of someone else describing it, like what happened with elephants). When cameras stopped being complete garbage, all those family portrait painting jobs died. When cameras started to get good enough that randos could take all the pics they want, wherever they want, you lost sketch artists, landscape artists, anyone doing art for newspapers and so on. When cameras went digital, see my first paragraph. Now, any rando with a phone can snap a B-tier photo and send it to millions of people in 5 seconds, making a lot of jobs irrelevant. Tech advances to lower the skill floor (for better or worse).

>>161523 >AI are just souped up versions of Cleverbot recycling the same things in its database Eh, it's a lot more than Cleverbot, even if you say it's "souped up". Cleverbot just straight-up recorded people's replies to it, and replies to replies, so if someone says "hey, how are you?" it'd pull up someone's reply from when it itself said "hey, how are you?", and it just kept on recording replies forever, and the devs could probably open a file and read all the replies ever made (I hope nobody posted anything important to it.) AI works a lot more like a human brain, where concepts and "ideas" aren't stored in some easily-readable list in a folder, it's just a blurry mess of who-knows-what that just kinda... figures shit out on the fly. There's hundreds of billions of images, low res, high res, mirrored, flipped, scaled, shrunk, labeled, unlabled, reposted, re-reposted, tagged badly, tagged correctly, all crammed into a 4-8GB file. You'd need some serious alien tech to compress art that small, there's more pictures "in" an AI model than there are bits in the file, and storing a full-res image in literally just a single 1 or a single 0 isn't possible. The (main) reason AI art is so samey and regurgitated is mainly because people are just lazy shits that don't bother making a decent prompt. It's like commissioning a handful of artists on repeat and all you do with each is say "krystal big boobs anime" and sending over the money and not clarify further when the artist asks what pose she'd be in or what anime the art should be based on, rather than giving them more instructions like "I want art of Krystal from Star Fox, make her wear a purple kimono and have her pull it back to reveal her hugely inflated tits, and there should be a small electric pump hidden in the kimono, implying she's still inflating. Also make the whole pic in the early Naruto art style, and have Krystal leaning against the Leaf village's main gate, looking like she was waiting for you. Also put a pink flower behind her ear." AI has posing tools, it's got inpainting, upscaling, loads of refining options, different controlnets and LoRAs to use, thousands of models to pick from, different types and versions of generators, even a whole-ass node system for the really nerdy guys, but most people just don't use any of this because AI lowered the skill floor way too far and people are lazy. Lowering the skill floor of something is good and all, but then there's also no filter since now any rando can crap out 99999999999 different low-effort images in 10 minutes, so like, this whole thing is a double edged sword.

>>161479 >>161488 >>161516 >>161523 >>161524 >>161533 >>161539 Stakeholders win when you fags fight.

Enough sperging. More inflating