>>155062
>The guy is absolutely obsessed with starting deranged slap fights with a fetish he vehemently claims to despise
The guy is a namefag and namefags are typically attention whores, not unlike tripfags, so I'm not really surprised.
>onestly his frothing hatred of weight gain, slob, brap, etc is almost unanimous among berryfuckers
Really? I've seen plenty of berryfags who are into WG, slob, and farts. I think it might just be him or a subsection of berry fetishists who are real spergy about that stuff.
>he's been banned several times by his own admission.
He should stop being an idiot, then. The dude should stick to his art and writing. Picking fights with other tards on /aco/ or /d/ just makes him like a bigger tard.
>>155058
>To be fair I don't know much about this so I can't really talk about the whole hungry lurker thing but do we have definitive proof that this is they said?
idk but if lurker wanted to namefag I think he should've been assed to use a tripcode
>You can be sued for things like that if somebody has enough pocket change and is willing to ruin your life over it!
Sure, but I don't think random anonymous people online should be sued for making fun of a guy on the internet. It could be possible that someone could have used to his name to make him look bad, but that's what you should expect when you decide to namefag. You may very well not use the name field at all.
>Farts porn is cheese pizza molestation? Like how the fuck do you even come to that?
Lurker, allegedly, erroneously theorized that fart fetishism comes about as a result of babies being touched during a diaper change. He didn't claim that having a fetish for farts is on par with CSAM. Regardless, it is a totally batshit insane thing to post on a board where other chan schizos are sharing their fetish porn.