>>130045
Where to? The only image that I see that says directly was AI-enhanced or edited was the second one here, and that was because the first image was cut off.
Not to mention, this is a claim different from the previous one saying that she was pregnant, which is why I supplied the second image in my initial post. Unless I'm reading it wrong and the date next to the year are days instead of months (and if they are days, then that just makes the pregnancy claim less believable), I don't know of any pregnancies that last a year and maintain that consistent of an appearance, let alone make someone look like they are in the second trimester when they are in their first.
Again, not trying to be an asshole about this, but do you know anything that we don't? Is there anywhere that she wrote in Chinese that I couldn't use Google Translate for? Most of the Chinese writing in her images just seems to be the equivalent of a watermark using her Twitter name.
I'd understand if all this is wishful thinking on my part (even if it's for her personal comfort, a lack of video evidence can be grounds for suspicion), I'd just like good evidence to the contrary.