/bbwai/ - bbwai

Stable Diffusion, Loras, Chatbots

BBW-Chan is supported by simple text or static image ads from a-ads.com.
Please consider whitelisting us in your adblocker if you enjoy your stay!


Mode: Reply
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 9999

Files

Max file size: 10.00 MB

Max files: 6

Captcha
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

READ THE *RULES* BEFORE YOU POST!

[ / / ]

(17.04 KB 190x148 IMG_5384.jpeg)
Anonymous 10/17/2025 (Fri) 17:50:27 No. 36342
Im fucking done How do you guys make pornographic ai vids without it being incredibly frustrating and expensive? There is free stuff like sora but its so restrictive and buggy its basically unusable. There are websites that let you make ai videos but its like…you’d think if you pay like $10 a month or so you should be able to generate all you want. But no. You get like 1000 credits or whatever and each video is like 100 credits. Want sound and actually decent quality? Oh wait now its 250 credits. Want to make porn? . Think if you pay you should be able to generate anything you want? Lol no way fucker. You want to make anything salacious you have to buy out super premium dark gold package its $100 a month you get 10,000 credits and each video you make cost 9,000,000 credits and is only 5 seconds long.
Some people are just good with prompts and/or are lucky I guess.
I used to be subbed to Vidnoz-Gen, but I found out the hard way that they're extra sheisty; your credits do not roll over to the next month unless you keep paying for their monthly subscription, so you have to pay for both. Their image to video algo is fantastic, and I hope to eventually upload some of the stuff I made, not the value proposition was piss-poor. For reference, $11 a month got you 120 credits, and every 5-8sec video cost 8 credits to generate if you used their basic model (premium model cost 15). I found out about EasemateAI the other day and it's leagues better. They actually let you pick the algorithm you want, even Sora2. Sure, Sora2 is stupid expensive for the 1200 credits they give you for $10 a month, but having the option is nice. Runaway is the cheapest and fastest model (30 credits/5sec video), but the video quality is fantastic, and the videos are generated in under a minute, as opposed to Vidnoz taking about 5 minutes per video. I highly recommend EaseMate and sticking to Runaway. You can generate 40 videos a month with your monthly credit allotment that way.
>>36377 I meant to say, "but the value proposition is piss-poor."
>>36342 Local generation. Don't pay for anything but electricity. I got my GPU before the prices went fucking insane. Takes like five minutes per video, but that's okay.
>>41229 But you need a GPU thats a minimum 1000$, a computer that can fit an run it, atleast 500$, and if you want GOOD image models, you need atleast 32GB RAM and 24 GB VRAM, sending you to a minimum of 2500$, or more likely 3500$. Also you need to be technical enough to follow CMD installation guides, use node based software such as ComfyUI, figure out or ignore Docker because everyone wants to bundle docker into their setup. And of course have the local storage for models. Or, use your CPU and generate it in about three weeks. If your thrifty, you could find used gaming rigs, or state/private auctioned rigs or parts. But even in the best case scenario, its a 1000$ investment. Now if your a gamer and play primarily on console, id recommend just selling it and buying a PC anyways. Pirate your games and whatnot, youll save alot of money. Or just buy on sale on Steam. And then the value becomes alot better, since your genning porn and getting fantastic max res games. Otherwise pick up a second job for a month and decide whether you want that change to go to subscription models or your own hardware. I certainly know which I prefer, but my rig was useful to me far before AI was available to run on it.
I just use a A100 on Google Colab (PRO). $50 a month and you get roughly 71 hours of play time with that.
The other posts were technical, I'll spare you that cuz I'm dumn. Sorry if this is no help, especially since I'm here looking for something better. I used to use pollo.ai until they blew it up like a month ago. -was great, start and end frame upload, a little prompt and was fun and free. Since then, I've only been able to do start frame only and generate based solely on my prompt, and not on pollo but on akool.io Hope it helps.
>>36342 >How do you guys make pornographic ai vids without it being incredibly frustrating and expensive? easy: I don't
>>36342 Other thing that is pisses me off to no end is when editing drawings it always rearranges everything (I just want to change hairstyles, that's all), Grok has gotten so retarded to the point of a guessing game, whether or not the image is lewd or the fucking thing shit the bed and you'll have to refresh.
>>36342 The sex business has never really been about charity or some kind of higher art. Engaged, aware or feminist porn is outside the mainstream and pretty niche. At the end of the day, it’s always been about making money. In the case of lower-end live performers, it’s often a way to afford things like healthcare they otherwise couldn’t access. With AI-generated erotic content, the motivation isn’t basic living costs, but making profit is still the goal. So what’s the point here? That people shouldn’t pay for AI and should instead pay more to human creators? Even most human-made content is generic, low-quality and relatively expensive. People aren’t buying it out of sympathy, and even as society shifts, it’s not like this work brings real status or social capital. The idea that porn is made by intellectual, self-aware, artistic creators is mostly a myth , more like PR. In reality, it tends to come from the opposite end of the socioeconomic spectrum.
>>41522 Not just Grok, Gemini is showing that same problem as well. I asked to modify a picture and instead it generated a new one from zero. Man, I don't know where to move now I want to cry out of rage!

Delete
Report