>>62449 Interesting list. Never heard of number 5

I'm just referring to the 5th model since I forgot to mention Number 5 (Babychubz) lol

>>62454 I've never heard of babychubz

>>62455 She posts on Twitter & Tumblr sometimes but rarely tho - https://linktr.ee/BabyChubz

Forgot to post OF here, my fault. https://onlyfans.com/babychubz

Surely a stethoscope is better for this, no?

>>62309 Not familiar with him. Do you have any examples of his work you could post?

DeSadlo is my favorite. https://www.deviantart.com/desadlo Squeezy McSquashins is my runner-up. https://www.deviantart.com/squeezymcsquashins >>62319 Ned Sonntag and he wasn't cancelled, except in this schizo troll's addled mind. OG FA artist who started in the 70s, peaked in the 80s-90s and is still around but less active with fat stuff.

>>62394 Ned got accused of many instances of being a proponent of sexual assault or SA as it’s called. You can see his fetish for “non consent” in his cartoons about ghosts et al forcing women into feeder fetish situations. The poster above is a known rapist and eugenicist with ulterior motives behind rewriting history.

>>62399 I try to withhold judgement in these cases. But with all the information that keeps coming out— recognizing this infamous poster by his style makes me sure

>>62408 >>62399 I don't know what he means. Pratt is an art school in BK. In recent times, right wingers have attacked liberals for controlling art schools and making degenerate works of art. I don't think expansion art as an American idea is popular since people consume manga and anime.

>>62143 I feel like you've made a great point about certain types of feeders being very vocal. While I am also not a feeder myslef, I feel that as an enjoyer of feedism content, this sheds a very bad light on the community as a whole. >>62146 I would be very interested in how they handle things money-wise. Does he just buy her food for IRL feeding sessions? Does he then pay to feed her/have sex with her? If she was really into feedism she should be glad that someone is willing to play into this and sponsor some feedings, right...? Does he gift her any other money? So here are some of my personal thoughts/critiques on the documentary: 1. I don't think it is possible to discuss feedism outside of fat fetish. Not every FA has a feedism/feeder kink, but I'd argue that pretty much any feeder is also an FA. The documentary didn't touch on this at all, which might not sound that bad, but from my findings, FA's often get confused with feeders (often with death feedism kinks) by people who only ever heard the term feedism and never bothered to look into fat fetish stuff any further. Such a brief analysis would also show that many men who enjoy feedism content do have some sense of morality and would either never feed someone IRL/only sponsor stuffings online, know how to respect set boundaries of their feede, and have a committed relationship with their feede (unlike Tinder creep). 2. They don't make any distinction between feedism and feederism. With feedism, as to my understanding, you don't necessarily need a feeder and mostly gain the weight all by yourself (except for monetary help, selling content etc.). This would then bring to light the existence of solo female feedes who feed themselves in order to gain weight for their own pleasure rather than those looking for praise from their feeder. 3. While female feeders might be pretty uncommon male feedes I feel like, are not the kind of unicorns they are made out to be by the documentary. I mean just look at coomer posts including popular feedism words like "weigh(-in), bloat, stuffing, kcal/calorie etc." and see how many male creators pop up. 4. As they did not mention anything about fat fetishes they missed an opportunity to talk about other feedism-related kinks which are far safer in terms of health problems like: food play, bloating/inflation, padding/roleplay, burping, vore, amazon fetish/domination, squashing, trampling etc. The last ones also challenge another idea perpetuated by the Feeder being interviewed, which is that the feeder is always the dominant part. For things like squashing, humiliation stuff etc. this simply doesn't hold true. Although admittedly making someone obese to an unhealthy degree and their physical strength being attached only to their mass is a shaky argument. 5. Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I would have touched on feedism stuff without the intent of further wg. So idk if this is a thing among feeders but it would seem like a pretty safe way to at least sometimes indulge in this kink but to just limit the number of stuffing sessions and keep day-to-day food consumption at a normal level to maintain weight. 6. The documentary showed mostly negative examples of "feedism gone wrong" all of which were started by the exact same creepy Tinder guy. Geparkes example being particularly bad with the rapid wg. While in reality, rapid wg stays a fantasy even for most feeders. 7. They did not touch on closeted feeders/FA's who are either morally conflicted on the topic or are in fear of social judgment by their friends and family. 8. Another huge missing piece to this is the use of feeder as an inflationary hurtful term towards all FA's who just prefer fat women. A good example on this is @alin_up who recently married @curvemaria. He often gets called out as her feeder, to the point where youtube creators have dedicated entire videos talking about their problematic relationship and his obvious feeder tendencies, he must surely hide from the camera. 9. Terms like chubby, BBW, SSBBW, USSBBW, and immobile were not introduced in order to try and reduce feedism to its most extreme form. I was actually surprised they did not mention death feedism.

>>62154 @ 10 and 11: People who still try to criticize woke statements for their inconsistency should finally wake up: For them, it's not about truth, it's about power and nothing else than power, and being able to push people into believing in several irreconcilable thoughts at once is the highest form of power, cf. "1984". Those people are evil and insane. Don't try to argue with them, just pay them their €18.36 and otherwise keep clear of them.

>>62154 @ #2 - My understanding was that feederism and feedism are the same thing, it's just that feedism is the term preferred by some people because it implies a more equal relationship between the feeder and feedee (again, this is on the Wikipedia page for feederism). I think if a person is just gaining weight by themselves without a feeder being involved, they can call themselves a feedee, but personally I would just call this an autosexual weight gain fetish. @ #3 - True, but the male feedism community is very gay-dominated, and this doesn't fit with the narrative they were trying to push. Furthermore I think heterosexual female feeders are much rarer than heterosexual (or bisexual) male feedees. @ #7 - I know I'm repeating myself and stating the obvious, but they didn't include this because it didn't fit with their narrative. Also refer to my earlier comment that this documentary basically accurately reflects how normies see us, which is its raison d'être. It was clearly made by and for woke normies. In this narrative there is no room for sympathy with feeders. @ #9 - I am also surprised that they didn't mention death feedism. I find that ironic because the documentary seems to deliberately conflate feedism with death feedism. And honestly, for a lot of normies, there is no difference between the two. Come to think of it, the lack of distinction in the documentary is probably intentional rather than oversight. @ #10 - I think >>62160 is being a bit hyperbolic (I don't think woke people are necessarily evil nor power-hungry) but he does have a point. It's a pretty clear case of cognitive dissonance. I could say a lot about this, but I'll try to keep it brief. In my personal IRL experience (not just talking about hypotheticals or people talking rubbish on forums), most fat women want to have a boyfriend who'll "love them for who they are" without fetishizing them. But for them the bar for what constitutes "being fetishized" is often extremely low, to the point that (from an FA's perspective) they are essentially uncomfortable with men finding them attractive at all. The "correct" way to date fat women according to this woke worldview is to be *completely* agnostic about their fat. You're not allowed to like it or dislike it.

>>62174 The thing I started to notice about those plus size activist chicks, the ones trying to monopolize the victim mentality, dont want anything to do with the FA community most of the time. They want to be uncluded into the mainstream modelling scene and been seen as activists while the woke crowd cheers them on, shunning the people who legitimately find them attractive for fetishizing them. What they are focussed on are the men who Arent attracted to them because of their weight because if they cant complain about mainstream society, then they cant be victims, and if they cant be victims, they cant be activists.

>>62174 >2 I think the autoerotic part of feedism is often overlooked on purpose, because it takes away the simplified understanding of how this sexuality works. Which is too bad, because I think it’s way more interesting, going into how female bodies are judged and reclaimed in the process, the rebellious nature of being a feedee, and the idea that a woman could be inviting her partner into something of her own. >10 I don’t think it’s fair for (vanilla) women to expect men to find them attractive but also not have any feelings about how they present. That being said, it’s the natural product of years of mixed messaging to women about their bodies coming from different corners of society. Believe me, it sucks for the women even more than the men.

>>61446 >two customs I commissioned from Ivy and Rennaye post them please, I love those two

I once spent $4,500 in about 3–4 months. I really don’t want to talk about it, but it was the worst thing I have ever done

>>61446 Intriguing. What, roughly, do you get in terms of time/content from them for $200?

I sometimes get so horny i consider paying for content but i just get off to something free and it passes

>>62334 The videos were 10 mins each, so $10/min basically. This was a while ago — 10 years? — and I assume prices are a lot higher now. I knew Ivy and Rennaye have unusually good insight into the FA brain so I wrote a 1-paragraph premise and let them roll with it. And like I said, they got it. My tastes are vanilla so they were clothed, no real sexy stuff, just fetish scenarios where they bitched at each other about being fat lol. I don't know if nudity and/or sexual acts cost more.

Biggest was this black girl who was like 5'9 and massive everywhere but more apple shaped. Incredible wide ass with a big shelf though. Doggy was like fucking a wall of fat. She gave me the loudest, sloppiest, wettest head I have ever received, and her tits and arms just smothered me while I was laying on her bed. 2nd biggest is probably a tie between this Egyptian girl built like a 450lb Amazon, and a shoet white pear shaped chick, also around e 450, who's been posted here a couple times. The Egyptian girl wheezed when she got close to cumming. White girl had never ridden anyone before me,only tried missionary/doggy before, and said cowgirl was her favorite position after we started doing it. Big win.

>>62291 How did you meet them?

>>62291 >Doggy was like fucking a wall of fat. damn

My wife at her peak of 330 for 5’8”. She is very bottom heavy, so she only has the belly of a small fat. Sadly I never experienced my ideal of a 400 lb round belly woman.

>>62353 Wooplus for one, and Tinder for the other two

>>61884 >mfw an American noticed this but I didn't

Are we supposed to give a fuck?

>>61928 who cares? someone post more of the girl in the OP >>59517

>>62313 Her name is Kaylees Kandy. She is/was a Swedish feedee. Hasn't posted anything in a very long time AFAIK but there are still a few pics floating around out there.

>>61912 its fine dude, I'm an amateur linguist, I study this crap for fun, I've pointed things out to spanish speakers about their own language that they were genuinely surprised about, and I don't even speak spanish.

>>62311 That's one nice figure damm.

>>61852 If you are in this fetish, why did you even start something with someone so thin? There are so many fine BBWs out there... I would have said: get her pregnant and the busy life of a young mom will make her order more easy calorie-loaded take aways and she will gain again, but nowadays with Ozempic, I am not sure if it still works like that. If she is not comfortable being bigger, she will probably start ozempic when she gains again. You do you, but I could not be in a relationship if she is not at least a decent amount chubby.

>>62018 This is the only correct answer. You need to figure out whether you are capable of being attracted to a normal girl and this is just a fetish, or whether the attraction to chub is deeper. Only way to do that is long-term abstinence from the fetish. Be wary of the advice you take on this chan, porn addicts usually aren’t the most mentally healthy

>>62341 I don't think it will work. If you're only attracted to BBWs, the moment you see one on the street, your "abstinence" will be over. I know this from experience. My wife used to weigh around 180 kg — now she's closer to 140 and looks deflated. I honestly hate it. Anytime I see a beautiful, big woman, I just feel terrible.

Fix-er upper women are never where to start. If the woman isn't already within the range of BBW you already are attracted to there's little point continuing. The only caveat to that is if you're sexually in tune with each other, but it sounds like you're not. You might also find like me, the fatter you date, the fatter your desire goes up. Once I slept with a 400lbs girl when I was 23 that was it. My wife yoyos like fuck and now keeps herself lower but still is big (Uk size 28/ US 24) for her weight. I still find her attractive at 300, she's far sexier at 400, she was a dream at 450. TLDR : if it's fat girls that turn you on, date fat girls. You've plenty of time to settle down later on in life.

>>61927 No, just no. Feederism is My life and i want to get thin to immobile with a feeder.

>>61941 Then yeah kys then ig if you value a metaphysical concept more than yr own life then ig

>>61941 If all you want to offer in a relationship is getting fat than you will die sad and alone. if you're telling the truth about your work and school you could actually be happy but you're too much of a fetish addict for anyone to deal with. That's why you get rejected

And how would it be to contact you?

>>62278 WhatsApp: +506 64859466 Discord: fizzarollibertozzi Snapchat: wantbeimmobile

Power to the most maglomaniac gatekeepers that are lesbians of our collective. Being overly extreme seems to be the only way. Abundant girl temples help our vitality. The greeks have been teaching indigenous about greek metaphysics

gee this thread is surely very normal seek juses

Empty property lots and cruddy development is also a sign of invaders >>62113 Get nailed to a cross, israel. >see, I’m Austria, see I’m communism, see I’m not in danger! Whoever let you on my internet should be crucified as well. Power to my friends. Those who push faggotry aren’t apart of the singularity.

>>62132 Also high prices of any kind.

A true yankee is more than megalomania.

>>60778 She's had reddit at somepoint, and her dms were pretty open on there but her account would always get deleted. Maybe she's had one recently idk. But I think it's a lot harder in the U.K to be in the scene as a lot of people tend to hide their preference compared to the U.S because of the obesity rates over there.

>>60794 UK and US have almost the same obesity rate nowadays so think you need a better excuse for not being open.

>>60802 no I'm pretty open with my admiration.

>>44907 >>45671 looked myself and it seems her acc was removed or deleted, tragic that some abandon the scene. Got any archives, did she upload somewhere?

BabyGotHipz was good but she seems to have bailed on the scene entirely

I have noticed more transgender gainers popping up on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. I don't look into it because I'm not attracted to them.

>>61665 All I want to say it's that the AIs are going crazy with this concept of "Burgers and Fat Women", this shit is like worst than a brain-virus .. tell me if it's marketing, idk:

I mean, hardcore feedees are interested in changing their bodies in a significant way. Lots of them talk about being "true to who they are" by becoming super fat. I'm not surprised some of them find out they're trans along the journey. Seems like the whole concept of changing who you are physically to match who you think you are mentally is a shared concept between someone trans and someone who wants to blow up their size. It's not that far fetched that they'd be linked for some folks.

The answer's probably da joos if you ask that guy in the Better-With-Salt thread on /bbwdrawn/

>>62008 Last pic reminded me of this. Proof we need human artists.

>>62512 Thank you

>>62123 Can someone direct me to her material? All I'm getting are some bare ass redneck mf.

>>62125 Can you phrase your question as a defense or criticism of the state of Israel and its military actions?

>>62125 5 sec coomer search...smh https://coomer.su/onlyfans/user/chunkymonkeyxoxo https://onlyfans.com/chunkymonkeyxoxo

>>62054 >>I like fat girls >>my fat girlfriend is lazy >>I can't afford all her junk food No, I don't think you're cut out for this.

>>62170 The problem is this place is full of shysters and cheapskates who want free porn and are too Jewish to pay for their fat bitches food bill.

>>61760 I think it's because Boberry and Sadie aren't working for them anymore. It could also be the AIshit they've been pushing out recently. I don't really see any signs of them potentially going under, though. I'd rather wait for an official announcement before jumping to any conclusions.

>>61760 Beyond this, just a simple comparison of how many models the site had five years ago and how it's going now, it seems pretty clear that the site looks to be following a lot of other similar BBW Paysites. Onlyfans, Loyalfans, and other sites have really democratised the way models can make their own content hosting both videos, pics, and stories/updates in a way that really makes the site infrastructure that Bigcuties provides effectively redundant. Sure Bigcuties still has decent name recognition and might help out with some early sets (could be wrong on this but I think when you joined, they might have had someone help you with cam/lighting/editing work if needed), but if you can get a good enough camera or one of those ring lights, then you can get most of that stuff on your own as a model on the cheap. tbh, the decline of Bigcuties is actually kinda sad to me, and not just from a nostalgic perspective. For as much as we would like to joke about it, they did regularly have models who put out 20+ pic sets, an accommodating video, and members update relatively frequently, and even if you weren't always the biggest fan of what a set was, it was consistent. The same can't be said for a lot of Onlyfans models, who upload infrequently, will vary wildly in terms of pricing and quality, and wouldn't give you a good introduction into what you're getting if you paid. If they can't recruit new models (and again, why would you, as a fattie with an interest in kink modelling, join BC over a good cam and a ring light with an OF account), then I hope they're giving their remaining models a very good deal on sales and revenue.

>>61760 Bigcuties as a website doesn't seem like it's very expensive to run. It will probably stick around for a while.

>>61793 I don't think it's a question of operating costs. It's a question of content generation. The eight models that are left either aren't worried about how much money they're making from BigCuties (not enough to warrant making a switch that would give them more control and responsibility) or they're fine with how much and what kind of content they're putting out. Heather would absolutely be the last one out the door but it's not due to how much it costs to keep the site up or pay herself & staff to touch up photos. It'll be after realizing no one is left to work for her.

Multiple BC sites have also had guest models lately, sometimes more than once. That to me seems like another sign of decline, but to date the reports of BC's death have been greatly exaggerated, so what do I know? If Heather does finally shut down the site, I do hope Steph continues on an independent basis. Would be nice to not have to hurdle t he CCBill wall to access her pics and vids.